Impacts of cigarette litter
on terrestrial ecosystems in urban open spaces in Taiwan
N.T. Glass
B.A.,
Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, Fl, 2013
Abstract. Cigarette-related
litter is widely recognized as a negative influence on the environment, however specific impacts of cigarette butts on ecological processes are largely
unknown. Cigarettes contain many harmful chemicals which could potentially be
leached into ecosystems where littering occurs. Effects of this process are
amplified in urban open spaces where litter abundance is high and ecosystems are
heavily impacted by surrounding urban areas. I examine cigarette-derived litter impacts on terrestrial systems at a restored wetland
ecosystem in New Taipei City, Taiwan, by inserting smoked cigarette butts into treatment plots and observing changes in
plant growth, soil composition, and community interactions. In addition, the effects of cigarette-derived litter on seed germination and plant physiological processes were observed through the transplanting of four plant species into soil continuously treated with cigarette butts and through the planting of two species in three treatment pots containing three to twenty-seven cigarette butts. The
results found a positive correlation between cigarette butt abundance and increased soil pH and indicate cigarette-derived litter as a negative factor in seed germination and seedling growth. Seedlings in both field and offsite experiments exhibited reduced growth when soil was treated with seven cigarettes or above. However, mature species in transplanted and field observations appear unaffected by cigarette butts and no impact on biotic community interactions was found. This study represents the first document to investigate the hazards of cigarette-derived litter to terrestrial plants and will assist in assessing potential ecological risks of cigarette butts to the terrestrial environment.
1 Introduction
Cigarette butts can have important impacts on urban open
spaces as they are the most common form of litter worldwide with an estimated 4.5
trillion discarded annually (Slaughter et al., 2011; Giuliano et al., 2015). Cigarettes
contain over 4000 chemicals, including approximately 50 carcinogens, (Slaughter
et al., 2011; U.S.
Dept. of Health and Human Services, 2004) that may enter ecosystems through
the process of leaching (Micevska et al., 2006; Moerman and Potts 2011;
Slaughter et al., 2011). Despite the abundance of cigarette-related litter in
urban areas, the capacity of cigarette butts to affect the ecological processes
of urban open spaces and the wildlife within them is not yet fully understood.
Cigarette butts typically impact ecosystems through the
process of leaching chemicals (Moerman and Potts 2011; Slaughter et al., 2011),
although other impacts such as wildlife ingestion and wildfires may also occur.
While the effects of a major fire can be systematically studied, wildlife
ingestion of litter poses a challenge to ecologists as most evidence
on this front is anecdotal by nature (Novotny et al., 2011; Stanley
et al., 1988). Wildlife in urban areas often forage through litter and eat
indiscriminately, which may result in potential exposure to chemicals in
addition to choking hazards (Ocean
Conservancy 2008; Novotny et al., 2011), however little evidence of any
wildlife mortality due solely to cigarette butt consumption currently exists (Novotny
et al., 2011). As leachants, cigarettes have been shown to act as a continuous point source in water for contamination of multiple chemicals including nicotine,
ethylphenol, pesticides, and heavy metals (Micevska et al., 2006; Moerman and
Potts 2011; Slaughter et al., 2011), and to cause mortality in both saltwater
and freshwater fish (Slaughter et al., 2011). Research on which leached
chemicals pose the greatest threat to animals is slightly inconsistent as
studies suggest that either nicotine, ethylphenol, or pesticides are the most
immediately toxic of cigarette-derived chemicals to marine organisms (Micevska et
al., 2006; Slaughter et al., 2011). The risk of cigarette-derived litter to
significantly impact actual marine wildlife populations also remains unclear
(Slaughter et al., 2011), and even less information currently exists on
potential impacts of cigarette-derived leachants on terrestrial plant and
wildlife populations.
While the majority of discarded cigarette butts in cities ultimately
travel into urban waterways, those that remain in the ground lose an average of
only 30-35% of their mass within two years (Giuliano et al., 2015),
allowing ample time for moisture in the soil to initiate and continue a
leaching process. Long-term ecological impacts of this process are difficult to partition
due to the diversity and sheer number of chemicals present in manufactured
cigarettes. For example cigarettes contain the heavy metals Pb, Zn, Ni, Cu,
Cd, Mn, Cr, Fe, and As which have shown to accumulate within plants and cause
toxicity to grazers while simultaneously
decreasing plant growth and overall health (Rana and Masood 2002; Kebir
and Bouhadjera 2011; Singh and Agrawal 2007). However, this potential impact
is convoluted with the effects of other chemicals such as nicotine, which has
been used traditionally as an organic pesticide (Pottorff 2010) and has
been shown to increase seed germination rate and efficiency in certain plants (Rizvi
and Rizvi 1987). It should also be noted that most heavy metal studies
have focused on sites influenced by industrial waste (Kebir and Bouhadjera 2011; Singh
and Agrawal 2007) in which the accumulation of heavy metals occurs
relatively rapidly, and studies involving nicotine typically involve direct application of the pesticide to plant
subjects or areas. By contrast cigarette litter delivers small quantities of
these chemicals into the environment at multiple point sources, thus the quantity
of cigarette-derived leachants required to significantly affect ecosystems
requires further study before accurate predictions can be made.
Taiwan represents an ideal setting for study of
cigarette-derived leachant effects due to the immense amount of cigarette butt
litter generated in its principal city of New Taipei. Approximately 20.6% of
residents of New Taipei City smoke habitually (Health Promotion Administration,
Ministry of Health and Welfare 2014). The availability of ash trays in New
Taipei is restricted as public trash cans are discouraged by the city government
in order to minimize illegal dumping of trash (BBC News 2011), and thus smokers
tend to rely on daily street sweeping to minimize the impact of their litter. However,
much of the smaller pieces of litter (i.e. cigarette butts) are swept down the storm
drains of the city within minutes of being discarded either by water runoff,
wind, or human activity (many smokers aim for drains when discarding their
butts). The storm drains direct water runoff into the rivers surrounding the
city and thus facilitate a steady flow of litter from the city centers into the urban open spaces surrounding
the river basin.
In this study I observe the responses of plant communities and wildlife in replicate plots to varying treatments of cigarette-derived litter to the soil in Jiangzicuijinguan Riverside Park, an urban open space in New Taipei City, Taiwan. I also investigate the response of the plant
species Allium schoenoprasum, Tagetes patula, Viola tricolor, Rosmarinus officinalis, Salvia coccinae, and Sedum reflexum to cigarette-derived
leachants in controlled growing environments. Particular emphasis has been placed on the effects of chemical uptake in plants grown in affected soils and affected soil nutrient composition, although the effects of litter upon
soil microorganism communities may also provide valuable insights into the possible
extent of litter impact on below-ground activities of affected areas. My results provide an essential foundation for further research into appropriate management strategies for urban open spaces heavily impacted by cigarette-derived litter.
2 Methods
2.1 Site Description
The study was conducted in
a -3 ha restored wetland recreational area located in New Taipei City, Taiwan
on the grounds of Jiangzicuijinguan Riverside Park (25°2'21"N,
121°28'54"E). The site is managed by the New Taipei City municipal government. The area is dominated by reeds (Phragmites karka). Other
species include Japanese Hop (Humulus
japonicus), Twoflower wedelia (Melanthera
biflora), Indian camphorweed (Pluchea
indica), and Formosan Alder (Alnus
formosana). Mean annual temperature is 70.8 degrees F, and mean annual
precipitation is 82 inches. Common wildlife in the area includes the Common
Sandpiper, the Common Kingfisher, the Little Egret, the Night Heron, the
Fiddler Crab, the Taiwan Helice (Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2015) and
the common rat (Rattus norvegicus). Stray
dogs are also common throughout the area. Insects found on site include a
limited abundance of butterflies, moths, crickets, and spiders.
2.2 Field Treatment and Control Plots
This study utilized 3 control plots and 3 treatment
plots located within Jiangzicuijinguan Riverside Park. Each plot measured 3X3 ft and consisted of the same plant
species of approximately equal abundance, and was located equal distances from
both the riverbank and pedestrian walkway. Growing conditions were also similar for each plot. Control plots were located adjacent to
treatment plots. Each treatment plot contained smoked cigarette butts buried
3 inches within the soil in locations of a corresponding distance from other butts. Treatment plot #1 contained 3 smoked cigarette butts (each distanced a foot away from the others), treatment plot
#2 contained 5 smoked cigarette butts (each distanced 6 inches away from the others), and treatment plot #3 contained 10
cigarette butts (each distanced 2 inches away from the others). Each plot was visually evaluated weekly for the duration
of the study for measured growth and overall health of plants. Attention was also given to any signs of disturbance of plots by local wildlife, as well
as activity of soil communities. Growth measurements were taken in inches and plant health and organism activity observations were recorded on a numeric scale with 0 representing 100% wilt or no insect/wildlife activity and 10 representing 0% wilt or high insect/wildlife activity. After 70 days several plants were harvested from each plot and analyzed for nutrient content and signs of leachant contamination.
Soil samples were collected from each plot and analyzed as well.
2.3 Offsite Treatment and Control
Plots
In addition to the field experiment this study utilized potted plants to provide further insight into potential effects of cigarette litter
on plant physiological processes. Plants involved in this facet of the study
were Chive (Allium schoenoprasum) and Mexican Marigold (Tagetes patula).
Seeds were acquired for both species and planted within fertile soil in a 1o-inch
diameter ceramic pot and given optimal exposure to sunlight and water to
simulate ideal growing conditions. The soil used for this experiment tested as containing a medium-high amount of Phosphorus, a medium-high amount of Potassium, and a low amount of Nitrogen. Each plant species was grown in four pots: one control and 3 treatments. Each treatment contained cigarette butts buried at various depths within the soil. The first treatment
pot (hereafter TP1) included 3 smoked cigarette butts, the second treatment pot (hereafter TP2) contained 9 butts, and the third treatment pot (hereafter TP3) contained 27 butts.
A second facet of the study involved Pansy (Viola tricolor), Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), Sage Salvia (Salvia coccinae), and Blue Stonecrop (Sedum reflexum). Two adult plants of each species were transplanted into ceramic pots and given optimal exposure to sunlight and water (Figure 2.3.1). The soil used for this experiment tested as containing a medium amount of Phosphorus, a medium-high amount of Potassium, and a medium amount of Nitrogen. One pot served as a control and the other received 3 cigarette butts initially with another 3 added every 15 days for the duration of the study. All control and treatment pots were visually evaluated periodically for growth and overall health of plants. At the completion of the experiment plant and soil samples were collected and analyzed for signs of leachant contamination and nutrition composition.
In addition a pot containing 320 ounces of the test soil was used as an cigarette butt deposit. The soil used for this experiment tested as containing a medium-high amount of Phosphorus, a medium-high amount of Potassium, and a low amount of Nitrogen. At the completion of the study 279 cigarette butts were present in the pot, and a soil sample was taken and tested for pH and N-K-P content.
3 Results
3.1 Field Treatment Observations
Results found no discernible correlation between mature plant growth/health and abundance of cigarette butts in treatment plots #1 or #2 (Figure 3.1.1). Plant health in seedlings was slightly lower in treatment #3 than control #3. Below-ground and above-ground insect activity appeared unaffected by cigarette-litter. Wildlife sightings within the plots were limited, with 4 instances of foraging impacts occurring indiscriminately between plots.
3.2 Field Treatment Test Results
Results indicated soil and plant content of Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Potassium had no relationship with abundance of cigarette-litter (Figure 3.2.1, Figure 3.2.2). As expected, nutrient content was overall higher in plant matter than in corresponding soil. Soil pH tested higher in treatment plots than in control plots, with treatment #3 peaking at a pH level of 8. However, plant pH levels appeared unaffected.
3.3 Offsite Treatment Observations
Tagetes patula failed to germinate in the treatment or control pots. Allium schoenoprasum control, TP1, and TP2 sprouted within 10 days. TP3 failed to germinate. TP2 and TP3 exhibited stressful growing conditions, with TP2 sprouting but failing to grow any leaflets (Figure 3.3.1). TP1 exhibited slightly more growth and overall health than the control (Figure 3.3.2). The control's maximum length was 1.75 inches and maximum width was 0.75 inches. TP1's maximum length was 2.5 inches and maximum width was 1.25 inches. Control and TP1 began wilting 54 days after planting due to cold weather effects.
Rosmarinus officinalis wilted in both control and treatment pots within 10 days of transplanting. The remaining plants exhibited slight growth throughout the study with no significant change caused by the addition of cigarette butts to treatment pots (Figure 3.3.3). Viola tricolor treatment and control both exhibited poor health until they were eaten by wildlife 46 days after transplant. Salvia coccinae treatment was also eaten at this time. No discernible relationship exists between cigarette litter and insect activity within pots and on plants. Both Salvia coccinae plants successfully attracted pollinators. Sedum reflexum treatment exhibited slightly more growth than the control, while Salvia coccinae control exhibited more growth than the treatment (Figure 3.3.4).
3.4 Offsite Treatment Test Results
Results indicate cigarette-litter abundance exhibited a positive relationship with increased soil pH (Figure 3.4.1). The Ash Pot sample tested the highest pH level at 8.0. Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Potassium content appeared unaffected by cigarette-litter in both soils and plants (Figure 3.4.2). As expected, nutrient content is higher in the plants than in the soil due to nutrient uptake.
A second facet of the study involved Pansy (Viola tricolor), Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), Sage Salvia (Salvia coccinae), and Blue Stonecrop (Sedum reflexum). Two adult plants of each species were transplanted into ceramic pots and given optimal exposure to sunlight and water (Figure 2.3.1). The soil used for this experiment tested as containing a medium amount of Phosphorus, a medium-high amount of Potassium, and a medium amount of Nitrogen. One pot served as a control and the other received 3 cigarette butts initially with another 3 added every 15 days for the duration of the study. All control and treatment pots were visually evaluated periodically for growth and overall health of plants. At the completion of the experiment plant and soil samples were collected and analyzed for signs of leachant contamination and nutrition composition.
In addition a pot containing 320 ounces of the test soil was used as an cigarette butt deposit. The soil used for this experiment tested as containing a medium-high amount of Phosphorus, a medium-high amount of Potassium, and a low amount of Nitrogen. At the completion of the study 279 cigarette butts were present in the pot, and a soil sample was taken and tested for pH and N-K-P content.
3 Results
3.1 Field Treatment Observations
Results found no discernible correlation between mature plant growth/health and abundance of cigarette butts in treatment plots #1 or #2 (Figure 3.1.1). Plant health in seedlings was slightly lower in treatment #3 than control #3. Below-ground and above-ground insect activity appeared unaffected by cigarette-litter. Wildlife sightings within the plots were limited, with 4 instances of foraging impacts occurring indiscriminately between plots.
3.2 Field Treatment Test Results
Results indicated soil and plant content of Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Potassium had no relationship with abundance of cigarette-litter (Figure 3.2.1, Figure 3.2.2). As expected, nutrient content was overall higher in plant matter than in corresponding soil. Soil pH tested higher in treatment plots than in control plots, with treatment #3 peaking at a pH level of 8. However, plant pH levels appeared unaffected.
3.3 Offsite Treatment Observations
Tagetes patula failed to germinate in the treatment or control pots. Allium schoenoprasum control, TP1, and TP2 sprouted within 10 days. TP3 failed to germinate. TP2 and TP3 exhibited stressful growing conditions, with TP2 sprouting but failing to grow any leaflets (Figure 3.3.1). TP1 exhibited slightly more growth and overall health than the control (Figure 3.3.2). The control's maximum length was 1.75 inches and maximum width was 0.75 inches. TP1's maximum length was 2.5 inches and maximum width was 1.25 inches. Control and TP1 began wilting 54 days after planting due to cold weather effects.
Rosmarinus officinalis wilted in both control and treatment pots within 10 days of transplanting. The remaining plants exhibited slight growth throughout the study with no significant change caused by the addition of cigarette butts to treatment pots (Figure 3.3.3). Viola tricolor treatment and control both exhibited poor health until they were eaten by wildlife 46 days after transplant. Salvia coccinae treatment was also eaten at this time. No discernible relationship exists between cigarette litter and insect activity within pots and on plants. Both Salvia coccinae plants successfully attracted pollinators. Sedum reflexum treatment exhibited slightly more growth than the control, while Salvia coccinae control exhibited more growth than the treatment (Figure 3.3.4).
3.4 Offsite Treatment Test Results
Results indicate cigarette-litter abundance exhibited a positive relationship with increased soil pH (Figure 3.4.1). The Ash Pot sample tested the highest pH level at 8.0. Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Potassium content appeared unaffected by cigarette-litter in both soils and plants (Figure 3.4.2). As expected, nutrient content is higher in the plants than in the soil due to nutrient uptake.
4 Discussion
The lack of a discernible relationship between cigarette butt abundance and growth of mature plants within the transplanted pots and field plots suggests that the presence of cigarette-derived litter results in no short-term negative effects on established plant species (short-term referring to 3 months). The low-to-moderate presence of N-K-P in soils and the moderate-to-high presence of N-K-P in plant tissue shows that cigarette-derived litter does not inhibit nutrient absorption in mature plants. The increased pH level of treated soils is positively correlated with increased cigarette butt abundance and was present in both field and off-site treatments, suggesting cigarette-derived litter does impact soil chemistry without affecting nutrient availability. Furthermore, tissue from mature plants did not exhibit increased pH levels in treatment plots despite increased pH levels of affected soil. The results thus suggest that while cigarette-derived litter does impact soil chemistry, the effects do not negatively impact mature plants due to adequate defense mechanisms and plant stability.
While no discernible relationship between cigarette butt abundance and the growth of mature plants was found, offsite Allium schoenoprasum test results indicate a parabolic correlation between cigarette butt abundance and seed growth (Figure 4.1). In the germination stage, plants are driven to growth by soil factors such as temperature, moisture, light, and the presence of essential minerals. The failed germination of TP3, when contrasted to the successful germination of TP2, TP1, and the control, indicates a large presence of cigarette butts may impact these factors significantly enough to deter seed germination. The successful germination of TP2 further suggests the presence of cigarette-derived litter must be exceedingly high to impact seed germination (over 1.0 butts per square inch). Additional evidence of a parabolic correlation between cigarette butt abundance and seed growth is indicated by the halted growth of TP2. After successful germination, seedlings rely on the presence of nutrients for vegetative growth. The results of TP2 suggest cigarette-derived litter impacts on soil chemistry are significant enough to affect seedling absorption processes that are vital for continued growth. Soil tests show that nutrient availability was unaffected by cigarette butt presence, thus indicating the physiological processes of TP2 were negatively affected by the presence of cigarette-derived litter. Interestingly, the measurements of TP1 growth when compared to the control's growth indicate a small abundance of cigarette butts may positively impact seed growth. This result supports prior studies suggesting nicotine increases seed germination efficiency (Rizvi and Rizvi 1987), and thus the slight presence of cigarette butts (0.3 butts per square inch) should be considered as a possible driving factor for increased seedling growth. The equal presence of insect activity within all control and treatment pots discredits the potential of cigarette butts as a functioning pesticide, thereby eliminating the possibility that cigarette-derived litter is beneficial to seedlings as an insect-deterrent. The increased growth of TP1, if related to cigarette butt abundance, is thus due to slight alterations in the soil chemical composition. The results of the Allium schoenoprasum pots thus support the hypothesis that cigarette-derived leachants have a parabolic relationship with seed germination efficiency and seedling growth (with the vertex of the parabola being between 0.3 butts per square inch and 1.0 butts per square inch).
The field treatment observations and test results parallel the findings of the offsite observation and test results. Specifically, no significant relationship between cigarette butt abundance and below-ground and above-ground activity exists, and soil nutrient content and nutrient absorption processes in mature plants are unaffected by cigarette-derived litter. The positive relationship exhibited between cigarette butt abundance and increased soil pH levels indicates cigarette-derived litter significantly affects soil chemistry, however the potential of these effects to impact mature plants is negligible. Plants in the germination and seedling stages are at the most risk of being negatively impacted by cigarette-derived litter, although a slight presence of cigarette butts may increase seed germination efficiency and seedling growth.
5 Conclusions
This study highlights the potential of cigarette-derived litter to negatively impact plant growth in affected soils. My results indicate the presence of cigarette butts affect soil chemistry to a degree that presents significant challenges only to plants in the germination and initial vegetative growth stages. This theory is supported by the decreased health and growth exhibited by new growth in field treatment #3, the results of the offsite Allium schoenoprasum study, and the positive relationship between cigarette butt abundance and increased soil pH indicated by soil test results. Specific chemical impacts of cigarette leachants on soil chemistry remains unclear, however some evidence exists to indicate cigarette-derived litter may affect seedling physiological process such as nutrient absorption. Negative impacts on seed germination rate and seedling growth could have consequences for successional dynamics in heavily affected areas. Further study is recommended to assay the potential of cigarette-derived litter to impact seed germination and seedling growth across a range of species common in urban open areas.
Acknowledgements
This study would not be possible without the New Taipei City
government and their generous permission to allow the use of Jiangzicuijinguan
Riverside Park as a setting for my research.
References
BBC News, 2011. Close-Up: Taiwan’s musical garbage trucks.
BBC News, 23 January
2011. <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12242914> (accessed
13 Nov 2015
Giuliano, B., Gaspare, C., Guido, I., Salvatore, GA.,
Virginia, L. 2015. Cigarette Butt Decomposition
and Associated Chemical Changes Assessed by 13C CPMAS NMR.
PLoS One, 10(1) e0117393.
Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and
Welfare R.O.C. (Taiwan). Taiwan
Tobacco Control Annual Report 2014. 2014. Health Promotion Administration,
Ministry of Health and Welfare R.O.C. (Taiwan): Taipei, Taiwan.
<http://www.hpa.gov.tw/English/ClassShow.asp?No=201503030001>
(accessed
14 Nov 2015)
Kebir, T., Bouhadjera, K. 2011. Effects of Heavy Metals
Pollution in Soil and Plant in
Industrial Area, West Algeria. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society. 55(6),
1018-1023.
Micevska, T., Pablo, F., Patra, R., Warne, Ms. 2006.
Variation in, and causes of, toxicity
of cigarette butts to a cladoceran and microtox. Archives of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology. 50 (2), 205-212.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2015. Dansui
River Mangrove Wetland. Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, R.O.C. (Taiwan): Taipei, Taiwan. <http://www.taiwan.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=47459&ctNode=2627&mp=1>
(accessed
14 Nov 2015)
Moerman, JW., Potts, GE. 2011. Analysis of metals leached
from smoked cigarette litter. Tob Control 2011, 20(Supp 1): 30-35.
Novotny, TE., Hardin, SN., Hovda, LR., Khan, S., McLean,
MK., Novotny, DJ. 2011. Tobacco
and cigarette but consumption in humans and animals. Tob Control 2011,
20(Supp 1), 17-20.
Ocean Conservancy. 2008. Marine Debris: More Than an Eye
Sore. Washington, DC:
Ocean Conservancy. <http://www.oceanconservancy.org/site/DocServer/Marine_Debris_finalrevise.pdf?docID=4504> (accessed 14 Nov 2015).
Pottorff, LP. 2010. Some Pesticides Permitted in Organic
Gardening. Master Gardener
Program: Colorado State University Cooperative Extension; Denver,
CO. <http://www.colostate.edu/Dept/CoopExt/4dmg/VegFruit/organic.htm> (accessed
13 Nov 2015)
Rana, A., Masood, A. 2002. Heavy Metal Toxicity: Effect on
Plant Growth and Metal Uptake
by Wheat, and on Free Living Azotobacter.
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.
138(1), 165-180.
Rizvi, SJH., and Rizvi, V. 1987. Improving Crop Productivity
in India: Role of Allelochemicals.
Allelochemicals: Role in Agriculture and
Forestry. Washington,
DC: American Chemical Society. Chapter 7, 69-75.
Singh, RP., Agrawal, M. 2007. Effects of sewage sludge
amendment on heavy metal accumulation
and consequent responses of Beta vulgaris
plants. Chemosphere,
67(11), 2229-2240.
Slaughter, E., Gersberg, RM., Novotny, TE., Rudolph, J.,
Stransky, C., Watanabe, K. 2011.
Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and
freshwater fish. Tob Control 2011, 20(Supp 1): i25-i29.
Stanley K, Stabenau E, Landry A. 1988. Debris ingestion by
sea turtles along the Texas
coast. In Schroeder BA (Ed.) Eighth
Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation
and Biology; 1988 February 24-26; Fort Fisher, NC. NOAA Technical
Memorandum, 1988:119–21.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2004. The
Health Consequences of Smoking:
A Report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health:
Atlanta, GA.
Figures
Figure 2.3.1: Table of recorded weather observations for 10/10/16 to 12/5/16.
Figure 3.1.1: Chart of averages of plant health, plant growth, above-ground activity, below-ground activity, and wildlife activity in field plots on a scale of 0 (poor health/no activity) to 10 (robust health/high activity).
Figures
Figure 2.3.1: Table of recorded weather observations for 10/10/16 to 12/5/16.
| Date | Temp Min (F) | Temp Max (F) | Notes |
| 10/10 | 45 | 80 | clear |
| 10/11 | 44 | 77 | clear |
| 10/13 | 75 | 86 | clear |
| 10/17 | 55 | 86 | rain |
| 10/18 | 55 | 88 | cloudy |
| 10/20 | 61 | 91 | clear |
| 10/21 | 51 | 72 | partly cloudy |
| 10/22 | 42 | 69 | partly cloudy |
| 10/23 | 36 | 68 | clear |
| 10/24 | 41 | 84 | clear |
| 10/25 | 43 | 80 | clear |
| 10/26 | 44 | 79 | partly cloudy |
| 10/27 | 57 | 82 | cloudy |
| 10/31 | 50 | 88 | clear |
| 11/1 | 51 | 86 | partly cloudy |
| 11/2 | 56 | 78 | cloudy |
| 11/4 | 54 | 78 | cloudy |
| 11/5 | 42 | 74 | clear |
| 11/6 | 39 | 74 | partly cloudy |
| 11/7 | 38 | 74 | clear |
| 11/11 | 29 | 70 | partly cloudy |
| 11/14 | 32 | 64 | clear |
| 11/15 | 32 | 70 | partly cloudy |
| 11/16 | 35 | 75 | clear |
| 11/18 | 37 | 79 | clear |
| 11/21 | 25 | 58 | clear |
| 11/22 | 26 | 60 | clear |
| 11/28 | 45 | 69 | cloudy |
| 11/29 | 54 | 75 | partly cloudy |
| 11/30 | 49 | 72 | rain |
| 12/5 | 45 | 54 | clear |
Figure 3.1.1: Chart of averages of plant health, plant growth, above-ground activity, below-ground activity, and wildlife activity in field plots on a scale of 0 (poor health/no activity) to 10 (robust health/high activity).
Figure 3.2.1: Table of values for soil and plant pH and N-K-P content for field plots on a scale of 0 (0 pH or trace nutrient content) to 10 (10 pH or very high nutrient content).
| Control 1 | Treatment 1 | Control 2 | Treatment 2 | Control 3 | Treatment 3 | |
| Soil pH | 6.75 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6.5 | 8 |
| Plant pH | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6.5 |
| Soil Phosphorus | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 |
| Plant Phosphorus | 8.4 | 8.4 | 7 | 7 | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Soil Nitrogen | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Plant Nitrogen | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Soil Potassium | 8.4 | 8.4 | 9 | 9 | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Plant Potassium | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 7 | 7 |
Figure 3.2.2: Chart of averages of control and treatment field plots for soil and plant pH and N-K-P content on a scale of 0 (0 pH or trace nutrient content) to 10 (10 pH or very high nutrient content).
Figure 3.3.1: Length and width growth measurements in inches for Allium schoenoprasum TP1 (C1), TP2 (C2), and TP3 (C3) beginning on 10/10/16 and ending on 12/5/16.
Figure 3.3.2: Averages of growth for Allium schoenoprasum TP1 (C1) and TP2 (C2) beginning on 10/10/16 and ending on 12/5/16.
Figure 3.3.3: Table of values for length and width measurements in inches for Sedum reflexum control (B1), Sedum reflexum treatment (B2), Salvia coccinae control (S1), Salvia coccinae treatment (S2), Viola tricolor control (P1), and Viola tricolor treatment (P2) beginning on 10/10/16 and ending on 12/5/16.
| B1 Length | B1 Width | B2 Length | B2 Width | S1 Length | S1 Width | S2 Length | S2 Width | P1 Length | P1 Width | P2 Length | P2 Width |
| 3.5 | 6.75 | 3.5 | 7.25 | 5 | 10.5 | 6 | 6 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 3.5 | 6.75 | 3.5 | 7.25 | 5 | 10.5 | 6 | 6 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 4 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 | 9 | 5.25 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 9 |
| 4 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 | 9 | 5.25 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 9 |
| 4 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 | 9 | 5.25 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 9 |
| 3 | 5.5 | 3 | 7 | 6.75 | 8 | 5 | 6.5 | 5.75 | 5.5 | 5 | 3 |
| 3 | 5.5 | 3 | 7 | 6.75 | 8 | 5 | 6.5 | 5.75 | 5.5 | 5 | 3 |
| 3 | 5.5 | 3 | 7 | 6.75 | 8 | 5 | 6.5 | 5.75 | 5.5 | 5 | 3 |
| 3 | 5.5 | 3 | 7 | 6.75 | 8 | 5 | 6.5 | 5.75 | 5.5 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.5 | 5.75 | 3.5 | 7.25 | 8 | 9 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5.75 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 3.5 | 5.75 | 3.5 | 7.25 | 8 | 9 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5.75 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 3.5 | 5.75 | 3.5 | 7.25 | 8 | 9 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5.75 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 3.5 | 5.75 | 3.5 | 7.25 | 8 | 9 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5.75 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 10 | 10 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 10 | 10 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 10 | 10 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 10 | 10 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 10 | 10 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 10 | 10 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
| 4.5 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 9 | 10 | 4.5 | 4.75 | 4 | 3.5 |
| 4.5 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3.5 |
| 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.75 |
| 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4.25 | 8.5 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 9 | 11.5 | 10 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 9 | 11.5 | 10 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 9 | 11.5 | 10 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 8 | 4.5 | 9 | 11.5 | 9.25 | 4.5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 3.3.4: Chart of average growth measurements in inches for Sedum reflexum control (B1), Sedum reflexum treatment (B2), Salvia coccinae control (S1), Salvia coccinae treatment (S2), Viola tricolor control (P1), and Viola tricolor treatment (P2) beginning on 10/10/16 and ending on 12/5/16.
Figure 3.4.1: Chart of soil and plant pH levels for Viola tricolor control (Pansy 1), Viola tricolor treatment (Pansy 2), Salvia coccinae control (Salvia 1), Salvia coccinae treatment (Salvia 2), Sedum reflexum control (Spruce 1), Sedum reflexum treatment (Spruce 2), Rosmarinus officinalis control (Rose 1), Rosmarinus officinalis treatment (Rose 2), Allium schoenoprasum control (Chive 1) Allium schoenoprasum TP1 (Chive 2), TP2 (Chive 3), and TP3 (Chive 4), and the Ash Pot (Ash tray).
Figure 3.4.2: Table of values for N-K-P content of Viola tricolor control (Pansy 1), Viola tricolor treatment (Pansy 2), Salvia coccinae control (Salvia 1), Salvia coccinae treatment (Salvia 2), Sedum reflexum control (Spruce 1), Sedum reflexum treatment (Spruce 2), Rosmarinus officinalis control (Rose 1), Rosmarinus officinalis treatment (Rose 2), Allium schoenoprasum control (Chive 1) Allium schoenoprasum TP1 (Chive 2), TP2 (Chive 3), and TP3 (Chive 4), and the Ash Pot (Ash tray), with 0 representing trace amount, 1.4 representing trace-low amount, 2.8 representing low amount, 4.2 representing medium-low amount, 5.6 representing medium amount, 7 representing medium high amount, 8.4 representing high amount, and 9.8 representing very high amount.
| Plant | Soil Phosphorus | Plant Phosphours | Soil Nitrogen | Plant Nitrogen | Soil Potassium | Plant Potassium |
| Pansy 1 | 0 | 1.4 | 7 | |||
| Pansy 2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 4.2 | |||
| Salvia 1 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 0 | 0 | 2.8 | 9.8 |
| Salvia 2 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 4.2 | 8.4 | 1.4 | 9.8 |
| Spruce 1 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 7 | 8.4 |
| Spruce 2 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 7 | 9.8 |
| Rose 1 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 7 |
| Rose 2 | 2.8 | 8.4 | 4.2 | 8.4 | 7 | 7 |
| Chive 1 | 2.8 | 0 | 9.8 | |||
| Chive 2 | 1.4 | 0 | 9.8 | |||
| Chive 3 | 4.2 | 0 | 9.8 | |||
| Chive 4 | 5.6 | 0 | 9.8 | |||
| Ash tray | 8.4 | 0 | 7 | |||
| Control | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Figure 4.1: Chart of average growth in inches of Allium schoenoprasum control and treatments over time.
